نوع مقاله : مقاله کوتاه
نویسندگان
1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشا.رزی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز
2 دانشیار بخش ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشا.رزی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز
چکیده
بیش از دو دهه است که توسعه پایدار و بهتبع آن توسعه اکولوژیک ودوستدار طبیعت و توجه به رفتار اکولوژیک برای اندیشمندان اهمیتپیدا کرده است. منظور از رفتار اکولوژیک در کشاورزی، کشت باروشهای مناسب جهت حفاظت آب و خاک و منابع می باشد . هدفاین پژوهش، بررسی سازه ه ای پیش بینی کننده رفتار اکولوژیکذرت کاران شهرستان شیراز نسبت به مصرف نهاده ه ا (آب، کودشیمیایی، سموم شیمیایی و ماشین آلات) بر اساس مدل جامعتشخیص عمل بوده است. در اجرای این پژوهش از فن پیمایش و ابزارپرسش نامه استفاده شده است. جامعه مورد بررسی در این پیمایش،کلیه ذرتکاران شهرستان شیراز بودند . روش نمونه گیری در اینپژوهش، طبقهبندی تصادفی متناسب بود و حجم نمونه 220 نفربرآورد گردید. یافتهها نشان داد بر اساس شاخصهای به کار گرفتهشده، رفتار اکولوژیک ذرت کاران مورد مطالعه در وضعیت مطلوبینبوده و حدود 70 درصد ایشان کم تر از حد متوسط شاخص طراحیشده، امتیاز کسب نمودهاند. با توجه به مدل رفتار اکولوژیک، اثر چهاردسته متغیر (سازه ه ای موقعیتی و فرآیندهای هنجاری، عادتی،عمدی) بهعنوان سازههای مؤثر بر رفتار اکولوژیک سنجیده شد کههشت متغیر از بین آنها توانستند جمعاً 54 درصد از تغییرات رفتاراکولوژیک ذرت کاران را پیشبینی کنند. نتایج نشان داد که مدل بهکارگرفته شده قادر است به خوبی سازه ه ای مؤثر بر رفتار اکولوژیککشاورزان را مورد تحلیل و تبیین قرار دهد. در پایان پیشنهادهایی درراستای دستاوردهای تحقیق ارائه شده است.
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Predicting Factors of Maize Growers’ Ecological Behavior in Shiraz County: Application of Comprehensive Action Determination Model
نویسندگان [English]
- Nasim Izadi 1
- Dariush Hayati 2
1 MSc. Department of Agricultural Extension and Education Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz
2 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Shiraz
چکیده [English]
It passes more thantwodecadesthat sustainable developmentand consequently ecological and nature-phile development and also more attention to ecological behavior has been important for experts. The ecological behavior in farming means cultivate with suitable methods for soil, water and other resources conservation. The aim of this study was investigating the predicting factors of maize growers’ ecological behavior toward consumption of inputs (water, fertilizer, chemical pesticides and machinery), based on comprehensive action determination model. Survey method and questionnaire technique have been used. All maize growers who active in Shiraz County were the research statistical population. A total number of 220 maize growers were selected as sample group through stratified random sampling method. Findings revealed that the ecological behavior of maize growers were not in good condition. About 70 percent of them got grade less than average of the index which were used to measure their ecological behavior. Based on the ecological model of behavior that formed the theoretical framework of the study, four categories of variables (situational factors; and intentional, habitual, normative processes) used to predict the maze growers’ ecological behaviors. Findings revealed totally eight variables could predict 54 percent of maize growers’ ecological behavior changes. Results showed that the model capable to analyze and explain predicting factors of ecological behavior. According to results, some recommend-dations have presented at the end of article.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Keywords: Ecological behavior
- Predicting factors
- Maize growers
- Shiraz County
- Comprehensive Action Determination
- to pridict ecological behavior and willingness to
- sacrifice. Joutnal of Environmental Psychology.
- ; 31, 257-265.
- Oerker, B., & Bogner, F. X.. Gender, age and
- subject matter: Impact on teacherâs ecological
- values. Environmentalist. 2010; 30, 117-122. [16]
- Klockner, C. A., & Matthies, E.. Structural
- modeling of car use on the way to the university
- in different settings: interplay of norms, habits,
- situational restraints, and perceived behavioral
- control. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
- ; 39, 8, 1807â1834.
- Yue, H., & Bao Jingling, Z. Q. Research on effect
- situtional factors to environment behavior of
- urban residens. Management and Service
- Science; 2009; 9, 1-3.
- Klockner, C. A., & Friedrichsmeier, T.. A multilevel
- approach to travel mode choice â How
- person characteristics and situation specific
- aspects determine car use in a student sample.
- Transportation Research Part F: Traffic
- Psychology and Behaviour, 2011;14 (4), 261-277.
- Klockner, C. A., & Blobaum, A.. A
- comprehensive action determination model:
- Toward a broader understanding of ecological
- behaviour using the example of travel mode
- choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology,
- ; 30, 574-586.
- Kaiser, F. G., Doka, G., Hofstetter, P., & Ranney,
- M. A.. Ecological behavior and its environmental
- consequences: A life cycle assessment of a self â
- report measure. Journal of Environmental
- Psychology. 2003; 23, 11-20.
- Gonzalez Lopez, A., & Cuervo-Arango, M. A.
- Relationship among values, beliefs, norms and
- ecological behavior. Psicolhema; 2008; 20(4),
- -629.
- Yan, S., & Chun-You, W.. An empirical study on
- influencing factors of residentâs environmental
- behavior. Management Science and Engineering;
- ; 20197-2202.
- Stevenson, K. Ecological Identification: An
- Exploration into the Motivations of Ecological
- Behavior. Thesis of Master of Art, Canada,
- University of Manitoba. (2009).
- Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Strumse, E..
- Psychological restoration in nature as a source of
- motivation for ecological behaviour. Environmental
- Conservation. 2007; 34(4), 291-299.
- Rahimi, H.. The role of culture in development.
- Journal of economical politic, 2001; 167-168,Retrieved from: www.maj.ir/portal/ File/
- ShowFile.aspx (2010) [In Persian].
- Moeinaldini, J.. Application of regional
- development policies, Lessons from the
- experience of developed countries. Journal of
- Political Science, 2007; 7, 71- 96 [In Persian].
- Carson, R.. Silent spring. Translated by:
- Vahabzade, A., Kuchaki, A. & Alizade, A.
- Mashhad. Jihad publication institute(2002) [In
- Persian].
- Milfont, T.. The effects of social desirability on
- self-reported environmental attitudes and
- ecological behavior. Environmentalist. 2009; 24,
- -269.
- Schultz, P. W.. Environmental attitudes and
- behaviors across cultures. In: Lonner WJ, Dinnel
- DL, Hayes SA, Sattler DN (eds.). Online
- readings in psychology and culture (Unit 8,
- Chapter 4). Department of Psychology, Center
- for Cross- Cultural Research, Western
- Washington University, Bellingham. Retrieved
- from http://www.ac.wwu.edu/ culture/
- Schultz.htm (2002).
- Bamberrg, S.. How does environmental concern
- influence specific environmentally related
- behaviours? A new answer to an old question. J
- Environ Psychol, 2003; 23: 21â32.
- Sachs, I.. The ecology and philosophy of
- development. Translated by seid Hamid Nohi.
- Tehran, Kian institute (1994) [In Persian].
- Wlodzimierz, Z. Philosophical and axilogical basis
- of ecodevelopment. Problemy ekorozwoju; 2007;
- , 1, 19-25.
- Krichmann, H.