Assessment of effective environmental factors in oil and gas industry policies using PESTLE & SWOT analysis (case study: Kurdistan, Iraq)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Environmental Planning, Management and Education, Faculty of Environment, Campus of Technical Schools, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction:
Today, the energy sector has an important role in modern society, and a comprehensive understanding of its performance is needed not only to decide on domestic energy policies but also to develop sustainable economic policies. With more than 60 billion barrels of oil reserves and about 200 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, the Kurdistan region has attracted the attention of industrialized nations who need more energy of oil and natural gas. It is the eighth largest oil-producing region in the world that is divided into more than 57 oilfields. Considering the importance of this area and the vast environmental impacts of oil and gas, the purpose of this study was to identify the influential environmental factors in oil and gas policymaking.
Material and methods:
The present study was applied research that used field evaluating and interviews with experts to obtain the required information. In this research, data were collected by the Delphi method and through a questionnaire. The SWOT & PESTLE model was used to analyze the information and identify the effective environmental factors in oil and gas policymaking.
Results and discussion:
According to the results of the internal factor evaluation matrix, the number of weaknesses was higher and the oil and gas industry and environmental experts gave it the highest score. Results also indicated that the oil and gas industries, although having different strengths and effectiveness, but weaknesses were more effective. Strengths such as the existence of vast oil and gas reserves in the Kurdistan region, the existence of relative democracy, the preservation of civil and political rights, economic development, and the growth of GNP and GDP, obtained the highest scores. On the other hand, deficiency in strategic planning and macroeconomic policies, lack of a coherent and robust management system in line with financial and contracts transparency, and the ineffectiveness of the tax and customs system were the weaknesses. Therefore, it can be concluded that the oil and gas industry, despite its normal growth and development, needs to use great strategies to prioritize environmental preservation, sustainable development, transparency, and management. Also, according to the results obtained in the external factors assessment matrix, it was observed that the oil and gas industries had more opportunities than threats. According to the scores given by experts, the most important opportunities and threats were the future energy needs of the world and the lack of political boundaries and connection to the free seas of the world.
Conclusions:
It was observed that the strategic position of the oil and gas industries in the Kurdistan region was in the conservative strategies section (overcoming the opportunities points on threats and weaknesses on the strengths) with the approach of environmental protection and preservation policies to achieve sustainable development. Therefore, macro strategies are proposed in line with the current conditions for the development of oil and gas industries, and the presentation and implementation of environmental policies, so that we reduce the existing threats using existing opportunities and turn the weaknesses into strengths.

Keywords

References

  1. Adedeji, A.N., Sidique, S.F., Rahman, A.A. and Law, S.H., 2016. The role of local content policy in local value creation in Nigeria's oil industry: a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. Resources Policy. 49, 61-73.
  2. Bianco, V., Scarpa, F. and Tagliafico, L.A., 2014. Analysis and future outlook of natural gas consumption in the Italian residential sector. Energy Conversion and Management. 87, 754-764.
  3. Bloomberg, 2012. SWOT, PESTEL, Porter’s 5 Forces and Value Chain.1-16. Available online at: https://www.ivoryresearch.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/09/Bloomberg-Business-sample1.pdf.
  4. Chapman, D.P., 2009. Security forces of the Kurdistan regional government. Center for Strategic and International Studies Washington DC, USA.
  5. Chauhan, A. and Saini, R.P., 2014. A review on integrated renewable energy system based power generation for stand-alone applications: configurations, storage options, sizing methodologies and control. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 38, 99-120.
  6. Chen, W.M., Kim, H. and Yamaguchi, H., 2014. Renewable energy in eastern Asia: Renewable energy policy review and comparative SWOT analysis for promoting renewable energy in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Energy Policy. 74, 319-329.
  7. Cohen, S., 2014. Understanding Environmental Policy. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.
  8. Dcosta, A., 2011. PESTLE analysis history and application. by Edwards G. Available online at: http://www. brighthubpm. com/projectplanning/
  9. -pestle-analysis-history-andapplication.
  10. Duarte, C., Ettkin, L.P., Helms, M.M. and Anderson, M.S., 2006. The challenge of Venezuela: a SWOT analysis. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal. 16(3/4), 233-247.
  11. Eaton, T.T., 2013. Science-based decision-making on complex issues: Marcellus shale gas hydrofracking and New York City water supply. Science of the Total Environment. 461, 158-169.
  12. Energy Fact back, 2016-2017.crude oil section. Natural resources Canada, Canada P, 28.
  13. Erickson, S. L. and King, B. J.,1999. Fundamentals of environmental management. (New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons).
  14. Gurbuz, T., 2013. A modified strategic position and action evaluation (SPACE) matrix method. International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. 13th - 15th March, Hong Kong, China.
  15. Rows, H., Mason, R. and Dickel, K., 1982. Strategic Management and Business Policy: Methodological Approach, Reading Massachusetts. Addison-Wesley publishing CO, USA.
  16. Harris, G., Heptonstall, P., Gross, R. and Handley, D., 2013. Cost estimates for nuclear power in the UK. Energy Policy. 62, 431-442.
  17. Isoherranen, V., 2012. Strategy analysis frameworks for strategy orientation and focus. University of Oulu, Faculty of Technology, pp.27-33.
  18. Jimenez, B.S., 2013. Strategic planning and the fiscal performance of city governments during the Great Recession. The American Review of Public Administration. 43(5), 581-601.
  19. Koumparoulis, D.N., 2013. PEST Analysis: the case of E-shop. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences. 2(2), 31-36.
  20. Kulkarni, V. and Ramachandra, T.V., 2006. Environmental Management. The Energy and Resources Institute, T E R I Press, India.
  21. Melikoglu, M., 2014. Shale gas: analysis of its role in the global energy market. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 37, 460-468.
  22. Melo, M.T., Nickel, S. and Saldanha-Da-Gama, F., 2009. Facility location and supply chain management–A review. European Journal of
  23. Operational Research. 196(2), 401-412.
  24. Mills, R., 2016. Under the Mountains: Kurdish Oil and Regional Politics. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, England.
  25. Ministry of Natural Resources, 2018. Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq. Oil production, export, consumption and revenue. Available online at: http://mnr.krg.org/index.php/en/pressreleases/602-krg-ministry-of-natural-resources-welcomes-deloitte%E2%80%99s-audit-of-krg-oil-sector.
  26. Outlook, A.E., 2013. US Energy Information Administration. US Department of Energy, United States Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA.
  27. Rastogi, N.I.T.A.N.K. and Trivedi, M.K., 2016. PESTLE technique–a tool to identify external risks in construction projects. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET). 3(1), 384-388.
  28. Rimos, S., Hoadley, A.F. and Brennan, D.J., 2014. Determining the economic consequences of natural gas substitution. Energy Conversion and Management. 85, 709-717.
Environmental Sciences
Volume 18, Issue 3
October 2020
Pages 134-151

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics