Conceptualizing green infrastructure in cities located in the margin of Kavir

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Urban and Regional Design and Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 assistant professor-Dep of Urban and Regional planning and Design-Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism-Shahid Beheshti University


Introduction: Following the discovery, development, and maturation of green infrastructures, researchers have defined them as an integrated network of natural and semi-natural elements, providing a wide range of features and ecosystem services including ecological, economic, and social benefits for humans and other species. Today, green infrastructures are considered a part of novel water management paradigms in urban form and water studies. Regarding the management of water in cities in Iran, particularly those located on the fringe of Dasht-e Kavir, it is necessary to outline the operational definition of green infrastructures as networks in the ecosystem on the fringe of Dasht-e Kavir. Moreover, it is important to explain green infrastructures in arid and semi-arid regions, detailing the features. Accordingly, this study aimed to identify green infrastructures in Iranian desert cities. To achieve this goal, two main steps were specified: 1. Operational investigation and definition of green infrastructures in the mature urban and water discourses and 2. Proving green infrastructures applicable in desert-fringe cities through cases.
Material and methods: As the first step was determining the operational definition of green infrastructures, the content of literature related to the development and establishment of the concept of green infrastructures published between 2005 and 2020 was qualitatively analyzed. Consequently, a conceptual framework was developed for the operational definition of green infrastructures. In this study, content analysis used in qualitative studies was selected for examining the literature on environmental design with an inductive approach in order to identify the existing themes in the definition of green infrastructures. This method was selected to systematically analyze, summarize, categorize, and induce the literature including the definition of green infrastructures in order to shed light on the hidden meanings and pave the way for comparison with the infrastructures of historical cities located on the fringe of Dasht-e Kavir. In this study, the stages were in six steps: 1. Stating the problem, 2. Developing questions and aims, 3. Defining and determining variables, 4. Sampling and selecting analysis and background units, 5. Coding and categorizing, and 6. Analyzing, inducing, and reporting.
Results and discussion: The results of the qualitative content analysis yielded seven categories as follows: 1. The morphology of green infrastructures is influenced by the systemic nature of urban networks which consist of natural and artificial elements in the form of patches, corridors, and matrices to ultimately connect water and ground. 2. The establishment of macro or microgreen infrastructures, both inside and outside the cities and villages, have an extensive geographic dispersion. 3. Green infrastructures are multi-functional. 4. Green infrastructures develop in natural (animate or inanimate), artificial, and human backgrounds. 5. Green infrastructures create values through economic, social, and physical benefits. 6. Green infrastructures provide ecosystem services. 7. Green infrastructures will ultimately lead to sustainable management of resources.
The green infrastructure network is available in the cities located on the fringe of Dasht-e Kavir in Iran as a multi-functional value-creating system for providing ecosystem services and with the aim of sustainable management of resources. In operational terms, from the qanats, gardens, and floodways to urban and architectural spaces all form a multi-functional network of natural components such as gardens and artificial components such as qanats in linear form (corridors), spots, and arena such as the flexible seasonal green network between upstream and downstream hamlets for the two-way connection of water and ground in hot and arid climate.
Conclusion: Green infrastructure not only refers to urban organs which are a part of a natural and human-made ecological network but also applies to a scientific approach and method of environmental design and planning in which the best type of connection between water and urban form is available for supporting both natural and artificial processes in the management of water resources in the historical cities located on the fringe of the Dasht-e Kavir in Iran. Even in such hot and arid regions, green infrastructures are available as a multi-functional value-creating system for providing ecosystem services with the aim of sustainable management of resources. This network includes a wide range of natural and human-made water-based elements such as qanats, gardens, floodways, and urban spaces and architecture.



    • Ahern, J., 1995, Greenways as a planning strategy, Landscape and Urban Planning 33 (1-3), pp. 131–155. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(95)02039-V.
    • Ahern, J., (Ed.), 2007, Green infrastructure for cities. The spatial dimension. In. Cities of the Future: Towards Integrated Sustainable Water and Landscape Management. IWA Publishing: Citeseer.
    • Ahern, J., 2011, From fail-safe to safe-to-fail. Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world, Landscape and Urban Planning, 100 (4), pp. 341–343. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021.
    • Ahern, J; Cilliers, Sarel; Niemelä, Jari., 2014, The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design. A framework for supporting innovation, Landscape and Urban Planning 125, pp. 254–259.
    • Arsiya, A., Mehrabani golzar, M., 2018, A model for urban development based on natural infrastructure Case Study: Ditchs (Mãdi) of Isfahan and its value added. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 15(62), 25-36. doi: 10.22034/bagh.2018.66283
    • Amati, M. & Taylor, L., 2010, From Green Belts to Green Infrastructure, Planning Practice & Research 25 (2), pp. 143–155. DOI: 10.1080/02697451003740122.
    • APS Group Scotland, 2011, Green Infrastructure: Design and Placemaking: Scottish Government.
    • Ashley, R.; Lundy, L.; Ward, S.; Shaffer, P.; Walker, L.; Morgan, C. et al., 2013, Water-sensitive urban design. Opportunities for the UK, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer 166 (2), pp. 65–76. DOI: 10.1680/muen.12.00046.
    • Bartesaghi-Koc, C; Osmond, P; Peters, A., 2016, A Green Infrastructure Typology Matrix to Support Urban Microclimate Studies, Procedia Engineering 169, pp. 183–190. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.10.022.
    • Bartesaghi-Koc, C; Osmond, P; Peters, A., 2017, Towards a comprehensive green infrastructure typology: a systematic review of approaches, methods and typologies, Urban ecosystems 20 (1), pp. 15–35. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-016-0578-5.
    • Bartesaghi-Koc, C; Osmond, P; Peters, A., 2019, Mapping and classifying green infrastructure typologies for climate-related studies based on remote sensing data, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 37, pp. 154–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.11.008.
    • Benedict, M.; McMahon, ET., 2002, Green infrastructure. Smart conservation for the 21st century. In Renewable resources journal 20 (3), pp. 12–17.
    • Benedict, M. & McMahon, ET., 2006, Green infrastructure. Linking landscapes and communities / Mark A. Bendict, Edward T. McMahon. Washington, D.C., London: Island Press. Available online at
    • Bennett, E & Hassan, R M., 2003, Ecosystems and human well-being. A framework for assessment / contributing authors, Elena Bennett … [et al.] ; authors, Rashid Hassan … [et al.]. Washington, DC: Island Press.
    • Bonine, M., 1979, The morphogenesis of Iranian cities, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 69 (2), pp. 208–224. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1979.tb01252.x.
    • Bonine, M., 1980, Yazd and its hinterland. A central place system of dominance in the Central Iranian Plateau. Zugl.: Austin, Univ. of Texas, Diss., 1975. Marburg: Selbstverl. d. Geogr. Inst. d. Univ (Marburger geographische Schriften, 83).
    • Chatzimentor, A.; Apostolopoulou, E.; Mazaris, A D., 2020, A review of green infrastructure research in Europe: Challenges and opportunities, Landscape and Urban Planning 198, p. 103775. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103775.
    • Chelimsky, E., 1996, Content analysis: A methodology for structuring and analyzing written material: US General Accounting Office.
    • Clarkson, M., 2013, Epsom & Ewell Green Infrastructure Study. Epsom & Ewell Borough Council.
    • Colding, J., 2011, The role of ecosystem services in contemporary urban planning, in Urban Ecology: Patterns, Processes, and Applications, Jari Niemelä (editor in chief) et al., pp. 228–237.
    • Corbin, J. & Strauss, A., 1990, Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria, Qualitative sociology 13 (1), pp. 3–21.
    • Czechowski, D., 2015, Revising green infrastructure. Concepts between nature and design / edited by Daniel Czechowski, Thomas Hauck, and Georg Hausladen. 1st. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
    • Davies, C.; MacFarlane, R.; McGloin, C.; Roe, M., 2006, Green infrastructure planning guide, Project: Final Report.
    • Delavar, A., 2001, Theoretical and practical research in the humanities and social sciences. Tehran: growth.
    • Douglas, I., 2015, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. In : Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences: Elsevier.
    • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2014, The Economic Benefits of Green Infrastructure. A Case Study of Lancaster, PA.
    • Esfanjari, E, 2016, A Conservation Management Plan for A Historic City, Research Institute of Culture Heritage, and Tourism (In Persian with English abstract).
    • Esmaeilzadeh seilabi, A., 2017, Eco-revelatory urban design. enhancing the perceptual experience of Tehran's river valleys, Darakeh river valley. Doctoral Thesis. Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran (In Persian with English abstract).
    • European Commission, 2016, Supporting the implementation of green infrastructure, Luxembourg: Publications Office the European Union.
    • European Environment Agency (EEA), 2011, Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion: The concept of green infrastructure and its integration into policies using monitoring systems, Technical report, 18, Luxembourg: Publications Office the European Union.
    • Fabos, J. G., 1995, Introduction and overview: the greenway movement, uses and potentials of greenways, Landscape and Urban Planning 33 (1-3), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(95)02035-R.
    • Fábos, J. G., 2004, Greenway planning in the United States: its origins and recent case studies, Landscape and Urban Planning 68 (2-3), pp. 321–342. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.07.003.
    • Forman, R.T., 2002, The missing catalyst: Design and planning with ecology roots, Ecology and design: Frameworks for learning, pp. 85–109.
    • Forman, R.T., & Godron, M., 1986, Landscape ecology. New York, Chichester: Wiley.
    • Ghaderian, M., 2016, National Registration of Bagshahr-e-Mehriz, General Administration of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism of Yazd Province (In Persian with English abstract).
    • Ghaderian, M, 2017, Delimitation of valuable areas and the boundaries of Shahdieh city, Shahdieh Municipality (In Persian with English abstract).
    • Ghobadian, A., 1982, central Iranian plataeu natural Resources of Yazd province in relation to desert problems.
    • M; Khatibi.M; Davoudpour.Z., & Khastou.M, 2022, Investigating Urban Management Measures in Green Infrastructure Regeneration Planning (Case Study: Lahijan). Journal of Geographical Engineering of Territory, 6 (11), p. 9 (In Persian with English abstract).
    • Goulding, Christina (2002): Grounded theory. A practical guide for management, business and market researchers / Christina Goulding. London: SAGE.
    • P. & Lak., A., 2017, Green Infrastructure: Finding a Common Language in Urban Design and Landscape Architecture Education, Soffeh, 27 (78), pp. 45–60 (In Persian with English abstract).
    • Hobbs, R., 1997, Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology, Landscape and Urban Planning 37 (1-2), pp. 1–9.
    • Holsti, Ole R., 1969, Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities, MA: Addison-Wesley (content analysis).
    • Horwood, K., 2011, Green infrastructure: reconciling urban green space and regional economic development: lessons learnt from experience in England's north-west region, Local Environment, 16 (10), pp. 963–975. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2011.607157.
    • Hsieh, H; Shannon, S., 2005, Three approaches to qualitative content analysis, Qualitative health research, 15 (9), pp. 1277–1288. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
    • Kim, H. & Tran, T., 2018, An Evaluation of Local Comprehensive Plans Toward Sustainable Green Infrastructure in US, Sustainability, 10 (11), p. 4143. DOI: 10.3390/su10114143.
    • Lambton, K. S., 1991, Landlord and peasant in Persia. A study of land tenure and land revenue administration / by Anne K. S. Lambton. London: Tauris.
    • Little, E., 1995, Greenways for America: Creating the North American Landscape, Baltimore: JHU Press.
    • Llausàs, A. & Roe, M., 2012, Green Infrastructure Planning: Cross-National Analysis between the Northeast of England (UK) and Catalonia (Spain), European Planning Studies, 20 (4), pp. 641–663. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.665032.
    • Lune, H. & Berg, B L., 2017, Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Ninth edition, Global edition. Harlow: Pearson.
    • Maroufy, Y. & Yusefzadeh, M., 2009, Content analysis in human sciences: Hamadan: Sepehr Danesh (In Persian with English abstract).
    • Masnavi M.R; Salehi. E.; Baghbani., 2015, Environmental Rehabilitation of Urban Distressed areas for improving the Quality of open and green spaces through integrating Brownfields into the green infrastructure systems in the framework of sustainable. Journal of Environmental Studies. 41 (2), pp. 483–498 (In Persian with English abstract).
    • May, E., 2010, Green Infrastructure: An Evidence Base for Birmingham. Technical report, Birmingham City Council.
    • Mazza L., Bennett G., De Nocker L., Gantioler S., Losarcos L., Margerison C., Kaphengst T., McConville A., Rayment M., ten Brink P., Tucker G., van Diggelen R. 2011. Green Infrastructure Implementation and Efficiency. Final report for the European Commission, DG Environment on Contract ENV.B.2/SER/2010/0059. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels and London.H; Samadi.M; Herischian.M, 2020, Investigating the Proportionality of Urban Green Infrastructure with Spatial Justice Approach Using Landscape Metrics and Fuzzy Network (ANP Fuzzy)(Case Study: Tabriz Metropolitan Area), Geographical Urban Planning Research, 8 (2), pp. 299–325 (In Persian with English abstract).
    • Mell, Ian C., 2017, Green infrastructure: reflections on past, present and future praxis, Landscape Research, 42 (2), pp. 135–145. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2016.1250875.
    • Mell, I.C., 2010, Green infrastructure: concepts, perceptions and its use in spatial planning (Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University).
    • Momeni Rad, A; Aliabadi.; Fardanesh. H.; Mozayani. N., 2014, Qualitative content analysis in research tradition: nature, stages and validity of the results, Educational Measurement, 4 (14), p. 187.
    • Monteiro, R; Ferreira, José C.; Antunes, P., 2020, Green Infrastructure Planning Principles: An Integrated Literature Review, Land, 9 (12), p. 525. DOI: 10.3390/land9120525.
    • Natural England, 2008, Housing Growth and Green Infrastructure. Available at:
    • Natural England, 2009, Green Infrastructure Guidance. Available at:
    • Naumann, S; Davis, M.; Kaphengst, T; Pieterse, Mav; Rayment, M., 2011, Design, implementation and cost elements of Green Infrastructure projects, Final report, European Commission, Brussels,
    • M. & Bemanian. M.R., 2020, Analysis of the Effect of Urban Green Infrastructure on Promotion of Environmental Sustainability Components, Journal of Architectural Thought, 3 (6), pp. 175–189 (In Persian with English abstract).
    • Olofsdotter, B; Björnberg, K; Chang, H; Kain, J; Linn, E; Scurrell, B., 2013, Competing for Urban Land: Synthesis Report for Urban Nexus. Urban Nexus.
    • Pakzad, P. & Osmond, P, 2016, Developing a Sustainability Indicator Set for Measuring Green Infrastructure Performance, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, pp. 68–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.009.
    • Parker, J. & Simpson, G.D., 2018, Public Green Infrastructure Contributes to City Livability: A Systematic Quantitative Review, Land, 7 (4), p. 161. DOI: 10.3390/land7040161.
    • Parker, J; Zingoni de Baro, M., 2019, Green Infrastructure in the Urban Environment: A Systematic Quantitative Review, Sustainability, 11 (11), p. 3182. DOI: 10.3390/su11113182.
    • Petty, N.J., Thomson, O.P. and Stew, G., 2012. Ready for a paradigm shift? Part 2: Introducing qualitative research methodologies and methods. Manual therapy, 17(5), pp.378-384. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.03.004.
    • C. & Sabri. A., 2011, Sustainable Stream Corridors Towards a Vision of Green Infrastructure Case Study: Tehran's Evin-Darakeh Stream Corridor, Environmental Sciences, 8 (2), p. 127 (In Persian with English abstract).
    • I; Mikaeili Tabrizi. A; Bahremand. A; Salmanmahiny. A., 2022, Multi-criteria prioritizing of Green Infrastructure Practices and their combinations to Control Runoff in Tehran Metropolitan. Journal of Environmental Studies, 48 (1), pp. 79–100 (In Persian with English abstract).
    • Schröpfer, T; Menz, S (Eds.), 2019, Dense and Green Building Typologies: Springer.
    • A.; Shabani. N.; Helmi Oskuie. P., 2006, Conservation of Stream Corridors as an Urban Infrastructure Case Study: Evin-Darakeh Stream Corridor. Environmental Sciences, 3 (4), pp. 1–6 (In Persian with English abstract).
    • Thomas, K. & Littlewood, S., 2010, From Green Belts to Green Infrastructure? The Evolution of a New Concept in the Emerging Soft Governance of Spatial Strategies. Planning Practice & Research, 25 (2), pp. 203–222. DOI: 10.1080/02697451003740213.
    • UNESCO, n.d. Kavir, Available online at:
    • Venkataramanan, V; Packman, A. I.; Peters, Daniel R.; Lopez, Denise; McCuskey, David J.; McDonald, Robert I. et al., 2019, A systematic review of the human health and social well-being outcomes of green infrastructure for stormwater and flood management. Journal of environmental management, 246, pp. 868–880. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.028.
    • West, N.E.N., 2010, Green Infrastructure Prospectus: A Prospectus for Green Infrastructure–Underpinning the Sustainable Development of Northwest England.
    • Williams, K., 2014, Urban form and infrastructure. A morphological review, London: Foresight, Government Office for Science.
    • Ying, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y. and Bilan, S., 2021. Green infrastructure: Systematic literature review. Economic Research-Ekonomska IstraÅživanja, pp.1-22. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1893202.
    • Young, R; Zanders, J; Lieberknecht, K; Fassman-Beck, E., 2014, A comprehensive typology for mainstreaming urban green infrastructure. Journal of Hydrology, 519, pp. 2571–2583. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.048.