<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Shahid Beheshti University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Advanced Environmental Sciences</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3115-7173</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Comparative Study of Ammonia Removal by Biofilters with Porous Compost and Processed Soil</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Comparative Study of Ammonia Removal by Biofilters with Porous Compost and Processed Soil</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">95089</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Saeed</FirstName>
					<LastName>Motesaddi Zarandi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ashraf</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mazaheri Tehrani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Instructor, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Assoudinejad</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; and member of Safety Promotion &amp; Injury Prevention Research Center.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>17</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 725.677px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.20236);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;Biofiltration is an efficient, easy and cost effective, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 739.053px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.00778);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;environmental friendly process for treating of ammonia from &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 752.781px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01467);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;air. The aim of this study is a comparative study of ammonia &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 766.157px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.10637);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;removal from air by biofilters with porous compost and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 779.533px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.05904);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;processed soil. In order to remove ammonia, two columns &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 793.261px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.02029);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;with 14 cm inner diameter were used. One of the columns is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 806.637px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01469);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;filled with porous compost and another column is filled with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 820.013px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01827);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;processed soil and scallop (scallop: processed soil, 1:4). The &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 833.741px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.06191);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;performances of biofilters were studied under 10 different &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 847.117px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.13454);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;flow rates (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 lit/min) and 5 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 860.493px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.989009);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;different NH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 186.56px; top: 865.069px; font-size: 7.392px; font-family: serif;&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 190.432px; top: 860.493px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.978908);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt; concentrations intervals (0-20, 20-40, 40-60, 60-&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 874.221px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.995909);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;80 and 80-100 ppm) in the 25 degree Celsius temperature and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 887.597px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.989969);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;optimum moisture (40-80%) interval. The results of this study &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 900.973px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.19708);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;show that efficiency is decreased when flow rate or &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 914.701px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01046);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;concentration is increased. The efficiency of porous compost &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 928.077px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.08693);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;was changed between 84.6 - 98.2% and the efficiency of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 941.453px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.990116);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;processed soil was changed between 91.5 – 100%. Maximum &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 955.181px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.09694);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;efficiency for both of the beds occurred on 0.19 g/(m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 397.408px; top: 953.069px; font-size: 7.392px; font-family: serif;&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 401.28px; top: 955.181px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.98406);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;.h) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 968.557px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.998001);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;loading rate. Efficiency of processed soil and porous compost &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 981.933px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.00002);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;was in 0-20 concentrations intervals at 1 lit/min flow rate and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 995.661px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.11002);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;beds attained 240 seconds. According to the results, for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 1009.04px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.05445);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;ammonia removal, the processed soil bed is more efficient &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 1022.41px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.978166);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;than the porous compost bed. &lt;/span&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 725.677px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.20236);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;Biofiltration is an efficient, easy and cost effective, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 739.053px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.00778);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;environmental friendly process for treating of ammonia from &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 752.781px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01467);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;air. The aim of this study is a comparative study of ammonia &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 766.157px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.10637);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;removal from air by biofilters with porous compost and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 779.533px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.05904);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;processed soil. In order to remove ammonia, two columns &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 793.261px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.02029);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;with 14 cm inner diameter were used. One of the columns is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 806.637px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01469);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;filled with porous compost and another column is filled with &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 820.013px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01827);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;processed soil and scallop (scallop: processed soil, 1:4). The &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 833.741px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.06191);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;performances of biofilters were studied under 10 different &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 847.117px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.13454);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;flow rates (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 lit/min) and 5 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 860.493px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.989009);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;different NH&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 186.56px; top: 865.069px; font-size: 7.392px; font-family: serif;&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 190.432px; top: 860.493px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.978908);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt; concentrations intervals (0-20, 20-40, 40-60, 60-&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 874.221px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.995909);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;80 and 80-100 ppm) in the 25 degree Celsius temperature and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 887.597px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.989969);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;optimum moisture (40-80%) interval. The results of this study &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 900.973px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.19708);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;show that efficiency is decreased when flow rate or &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 914.701px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.01046);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;concentration is increased. The efficiency of porous compost &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 928.077px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.08693);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;was changed between 84.6 - 98.2% and the efficiency of &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 941.453px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.990116);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;processed soil was changed between 91.5 – 100%. Maximum &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 955.181px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.09694);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;efficiency for both of the beds occurred on 0.19 g/(m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 397.408px; top: 953.069px; font-size: 7.392px; font-family: serif;&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 401.28px; top: 955.181px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.98406);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;.h) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 968.557px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.998001);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;loading rate. Efficiency of processed soil and porous compost &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 981.933px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.00002);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;was in 0-20 concentrations intervals at 1 lit/min flow rate and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 995.661px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.11002);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;beds attained 240 seconds. According to the results, for &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 1009.04px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(1.05445);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;ammonia removal, the processed soil bed is more efficient &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;left: 127.776px; top: 1022.41px; font-size: 11.616px; font-family: serif; transform: scaleX(0.978166);&quot; dir=&quot;ltr&quot;&gt;than the porous compost bed. &lt;/span&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ammonia</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Biofilters</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Porous Compost</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Processed Soil</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://envs.sbu.ac.ir/article_95089_1418e0e9b2557a85b1ffe6c95b51ab50.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
